Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22724, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22724 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour".</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22724, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22724 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour".</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa63ed2c0f5-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22724, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22724 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. &quot;How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what,&quot; Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, &quot;States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue.&quot; He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law &quot;hurriedly&quot; for political gain and &quot;hosting the notification on the web&quot; without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. &quot;Include states' concerns in your list of concerns,&quot; he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for &quot;making wheat to flour&quot;.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour".</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour". </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22724, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'metaKeywords' => 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour".</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22724, 'title' => 'Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually. </p> <p align="justify"> While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said. </p> <p align="justify"> Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. </p> <p align="justify"> UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. </p> <p align="justify"> Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. </p> <p align="justify"> He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. </p> <p align="justify"> The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour". </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 2 October, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wont-foot-food-bill-States/articleshow/23374602.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'wont-foot-food-bill-states-dipak-kumar-dash-22878', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22878, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22724 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash' $metaKeywords = 'Food Security Act,Right to Food,Food Security,PDS,Ration' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Several states want the Centre to foot the bill for all associated expenses such as transportation and commission to ration shops under the Food Security Act when it takes the credit for the scheme. Almost all states including Congress-ruled ones asked the Centre to bear these expenses which is estimated to be around Rs 10,000 crore annually.</p><p align="justify">While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said.</p><p align="justify">Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end.</p><p align="justify">Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added.</p><p align="justify">Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses.</p><p align="justify">UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system.</p><p align="justify">Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes.</p><p align="justify">He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab.</p><p align="justify">The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour".</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Won’t foot food bill: States -Dipak Kumar Dash |
-The Times of India
While most states represented by food ministers on Tuesday said the Centre should bear the entire expense, Uttarakhand wanted 90% central share of such expenses. State food ministers came down heavily on the Centre for not deciding this issue upfront before asking them to expedite launch of the scheme. "How can we have an Act without setting things clear on who shares what," Punjab's representative said. Though 22 states participated in the meeting, three BJP-ruled ones - Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh - did not send their ministers. Food minister K V Thomas said, "States have their opinion and we have ours. We will resolve the issue." He said a committee has been formed to address concerns. He added about 50% states including BJP-ruled ones will launch the scheme by this year-end. Earlier, leading the attack, Uttar Pradesh food minister Rajendra Chaudhary charged the government with bringing the law "hurriedly" for political gain and "hosting the notification on the web" without putting in place a system to ensure that the poor got foodgrain and there was no diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. "Include states' concerns in your list of concerns," he added. Chaudhary asked the Centre to bear 100% additional expenses on all accounts including transportation, handling, commission to ration shop owners and setting up of consumer redressal mechanism. He also sought funds in advance for implementation of the law. UP is the biggest gainer of the central law. Another state government official said that when the Centre is using the scheme for political dividend and can spend huge on food subsidy why can't it pay little more for other expenses. UPA's new-found friend JD(U) did not leave the opportunity to put forward its list of demands. Bihar food minister Shyam Rajak said the Centre should bear the entire expenditure on end-to-end computerization of the distribution system. Congress-ruled Andhra Pradesh demanded that the Centre should allocate 1.6 lakh tonnes of additional rice per month to meet its demand. State food minister Sridhar Basu said if the Centre did not help, then the state would end up spending Rs 3,000 crore annually, which would impact its other social security programmes. He asked the Centre to bear the entire expense for inter-state transport of foodgrain. The state also demanded inclusion of pulses and oil in the allocation to each poor family, a demand which came from other states including Punjab. The list of demands from states seems to be increasing with Himachal Pradesh asking the Centre to bear the expenses for "making wheat to flour". |