Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 150
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 151
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CIC orders disclosure of Cabinet notes on Bills

CIC orders disclosure of Cabinet notes on Bills

Share this article Share this article
published Published on Jun 28, 2012   modified Modified on Jun 28, 2012
-The Hindu

Once a Bill is tabled in Parliament after Cabinet nod, there can be no bar on disclosing the contents

The Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that once a Bill has been tabled in Parliament, the Cabinet decision and file notings relating to it can be made public.

Ordering the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) to produce the Cabinet note, papers and file notings relating to the Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority Bill, 2011, the CIC said that once the Cabinet cleared a Bill, and it was tabled in Parliament, there could be no further bar on disclosing the material, based on which the Cabinet had cleared the Bill.

Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said the Cabinet decision and the introduction of the Bill in Parliament in September 2011 together fulfilled the twin conditions set out in Section 8(1) (i) of the Right to Information Act: the Cabinet must have “taken the decision,” and the matter must be “complete or over.”

The DAE had rejected applicant Venkatesh Nayak’s request for a copy of the note it prepared for the Cabinet, on the grounds that the information sought was prohibited under Section 8(i) of the Act. This section disallows disclosure of “Cabinet papers, including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers,” with the rider that these can be made public “after the decision has been taken, and the matter is complete, or over.”

The DAE said that though the “decision had been taken,” the matter was not “complete or over” because the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology had deliberated on the Bill and forwarded its comments to the presiding officers of the two Houses of Parliament. Thus, the condition of the matter being “complete or over” had not been met.

Backdoor attempt

Mr. Nayak sought the Cabinet papers because, according to him, the Bill, among other things, was a backdoor attempt at amending the Act. The Bill provided for two amendments. The first sought exemption from the Act of sensitive information relating to nuclear radiation safety and sensitive information relating to technology-holders. The second sought exemption of regulatory bodies overseeing the nuclear facilities.

The proposed amendments drew the ire of Mr. Gandhi, who wrote to the Prime Minister in March this year, arguing that the existing provisions of the Act provided “adequate protection for the legitimate needs of information, which should not be disclosed.” It was unacceptable that safety regulators could be given blanket exemption from accountability, he said.

In his decision on the RTI application, Mr. Gandhi said: “Once the decision is taken by the Cabinet…‘decision has been taken’” and “when the Bill is tabled in Parliament, ‘the matter is complete or over’.” Further: “The heart and essence of democracy is the concept that each individual citizen is a sovereign in her own right, and she gives up a part of the sovereignty to the state, in return for which she gets the rule of law. This would facilitate a reasoned discussion and debate in the country among citizens and their public servants.”

DAE rejected request for Cabinet note on Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority Bill

Petitioner alleged that the Bill was a backdoor attempt at amending the RTI Act

The Hindu, 28 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3578994.ece


Related Articles

 

Write Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Video Archives

Archives

share on Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Feedback
Read Later

Contact Form

Please enter security code
      Close