Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 150
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 151
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Citizens ask FSSAI to stop mandatory food fortification- Warn against grave health and economic impacts in reductionist approaches to nutrition

Citizens ask FSSAI to stop mandatory food fortification- Warn against grave health and economic impacts in reductionist approaches to nutrition

Share this article Share this article
published Published on Aug 2, 2021   modified Modified on Aug 3, 2021

-Press release by Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture (ASHA Kisan Swaraj) dated 2 August, 2021

170 individuals and organizations along with the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture (ASHA Kisan Swaraj) have written to the FSSAI urging it to scrap its plans to make synthetic/ chemical fortification of foods mandatory in India [1]. They cited detrimental and irreversible health and socio-economic impacts such as market shifts in favor of large corporations, loss of livelihoods for small and informal players, monocultures in diets and reliance on packaged foods, lack of independent and conclusive evidence, and conflict-of-interest concerns. Signatories included medical experts, nutritionists, agricultural scientists, farmers’ organizations, academics, civil society organizations and concerned citizens from across India. 

Earlier this year, the FSSAI issued draft regulations on mandatory fortification of edible oil and milk with Vitamin A and D [2]. It has also announced intentions to make rice fortification mandatory with Vitamin B12, Iron, and Folic Acid starting 2024 [3]. The government recently initiated a 3-year centrally sponsored pilot scheme on rice fortification and supply via PDS in 15 districts across the country [4]. Since April, the government has also started to distribute fortified rice through the mid-day meal scheme and ICDS program citing widespread nutritional deficiencies [5]. Fortification approaches are receiving major a push in the United Nations Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) processes too, including from India. [6]

The FSSAI has responded saying that that it sees fortification only as a complementary strategy to diverse diets [7]. This in turn was in response to an earlier letter sent by civil society groups to FSSAI in November 2020 [8]. Activists point out that FSSAI’s intentions are questionable since FSSAI has cited industry-funded studies to justify fortification on a national scale, willfully ignoring conflict of interest since those very entities stand most to profit from such a policy. “If FSSAI really saw fortification as a complementary strategy, then why is fortification mandatory while dietary diversity and other holistic approaches to malnutrition are optional?,”asked the latest letter to FSSAI. 

A major problem with chemical fortification of foods, explains the letter, is that nutrients don’t work in isolation but need each other for optimal absorption. Further, in undernourished populations such as India’s, the key problem is calorie and especially protein inadequacy as a result of monotonous cereal-based diets along with low consumption of vegetables and animal protein. Adding one or two synthetic chemical vitamins and minerals will not solve the larger problem, and in undernourished populations can lead to toxicity, including gut inflammation. “Evidence supporting fortification is inconclusive and certainly not adequate before major national policies are rolled out,” said Dr Veena Shatrugna, former Deputy Director of National Institute of Nutrition. 

“It is ridiculous that the government is promoting polished rice, which has lost a lot of its nutrition on the one hand, and talks about chemical fortification on the other hand”, pointed out Dr Debal Deb, ecologist and traditional rice conservator.

The letter also points to serious economic impacts on consumers and informal players like small rice millers, oil ghanis/cold press oil mills, small farmers, and local enterprises who will not be able to make the heavy investments required. An indicative cost according to the government is 3.2 crore for rice fortification. “We have been hearing so much about atma -nirbharta, but since the only suppliers of synthetic micronutrients are multi-national corporations, with a history of cartelization and price hikes, FSSAI will seriously jeopardize our food security by making us dependent on such entities. FSSAI has no mechanism to regulate prices of such micronutrients that it wants to insert into our staple foods” said Usha Soolapani of ASHA.  

The letter warns the government against a blanket approach to meet the complexity of malnutrition in our country. The simple and complete solution they say, is to improve diets and diversify them via widely available nutrient dense vegetables, millets, animal protein, dairy.  Local communities, farmers and women’s collectives, and households can be supported via projects like backyard poultry and livestock, home gardens and many other tried and tested methods including agricultural pathways towards better nutrition, which are the best source of nutrition, even according to the FSSAI. 

Notes

[1] Please click here to access.

[2] Please click here to access.

[3] Please click here and here to access. 

[4] Please click here, here, and here to access.

[5] Please click here to access.

[6] Please click here to access.

[7] Please click here to access.  

[8] Please click here to access. 

 

 

For more information, please contact: 

Usha Soolapani at 9567157197  

Dr Vandana Prasad at +91 98915 52425

Or email at asha.kisanswaraj@gmail.com

 


Press release by Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture (ASHA Kisan Swaraj) dated 2 August, 2021,


Related Articles

 

Write Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Video Archives

Archives

share on Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Feedback
Read Later

Contact Form

Please enter security code
      Close