Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 150
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 151
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Opposition to food bill plan by Radhika Ramaseshan

Opposition to food bill plan by Radhika Ramaseshan

Share this article Share this article
published Published on Jul 16, 2010   modified Modified on Jul 16, 2010


The proposals on the food security law, tentatively agreed upon by the National Advisory Council yesterday, were opposed by right to food campaigners who insisted their concerns should be taken on board before the bill was put into shape.

Some of the campaigners, such as Nikhil Dey and Kavita Srivastava, were closely associated with council members Jean Dreze, Aruna Roy and Harsh Mander when they had worked together on the issue of legislating food security.

The campaigners’ response to the council’s blueprint, which needs to be fine-tuned, might have passed off as another expression of protest but for the perception that the “radicals” on the panel are still pushing their case for a much more inclusive law than the “conservatives” want and intend to step up pressure through the activists.

Among the objections listed were:

The council’s news release of July 14 spoke of the desirability of “time-bound universalisation” of food grain entitlements without spelling out the timeline

It was ambiguous about the food entitlements of those in areas that will not be covered in the first phase of the operation of the law

Grain entitlements should be allocated to individuals instead of a household

Silence on pulses and oil limits.


The Telegraph, 16 July, 2010, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100716/jsp/nation/story_12690206.jsp


Related Articles

 

Write Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Video Archives

Archives

share on Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Feedback
Read Later

Contact Form

Please enter security code
      Close