Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 150
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 151
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi

Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi

Share this article Share this article
published Published on Nov 11, 2011   modified Modified on Nov 11, 2011

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution’s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.

Principal judge S C Srivasatava’s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 — some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 — were not “sufficient evidence for conspiracy”.

Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura’s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.

The court observed that Bhatt’s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.

As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp — power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills — in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, “...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses”. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, “After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.”

Also coming in 2008 was a witness’s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.

The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart’s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.

Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.

Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. “The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,” the court said.

The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-t.../874108/


Related Articles

 

Write Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Video Archives

Archives

share on Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Feedback
Read Later

Contact Form

Please enter security code
      Close