Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 150
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 151
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Six information officers fined for delaying RTI reply by Ashutosh Shukla

Six information officers fined for delaying RTI reply by Ashutosh Shukla

Share this article Share this article
published Published on Oct 28, 2010   modified Modified on Oct 28, 2010

City-based Right to Information activist (RTI) Shailesh Gandhi, in his capacity as a central information commissioner, recently passed a landmark order under the RTI Act.

In an order dated October 22, he fined six public information officers (PIOs) of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) Rs25,000 each, the highest penalty amount allowed under the Act. The total fine comes to Rs1.5 lakh, which is the highest penalty levied for a single RTI application in the country. Apart from becoming a landmark order, it will also serve as a stern reminder for most officers who take the RTI Act casually.

The information sought did not pertain to the departments the six PIOs were in. As per the RTI Act, if a PIO is not concerned with the details sought, he should either seek it from the people who hold the information, or send the application to the concerned department. The fine was imposed on the PIOs for delaying this relay of information.

Ravi Bhushan Bali, an officer at the MCD, had sought information on the recruitment of 13 officers in the MCD, their ad hoc promotions, and the officer in-charge of such recruitments and promotions. He had also sought information on transfers of officers from the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to the MCD.

Dissatisfied by the reply he got and by the first appellate authority, Bali approached the central information commission. In its order, the commissioner stated, “The commission has been given no reasonable explanation for the delay in giving the information by the concerned officers. They all admitted that a letter was sent by the PIO to them to provide the service files of the 13 officers. A reminder was also given to them on 04/03/2010. They provided the service files and replies only after the order of the central information commission on September 10, 2010.”


DNA, 28 October, 2010, http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_six-information-officers-fined-for-delaying-rti-reply_1458806


Related Articles

 

Write Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Video Archives

Archives

share on Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Feedback
Read Later

Contact Form

Please enter security code
      Close