Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 150
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 151
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Time women farmers got a better deal -Purvi Mehta

Time women farmers got a better deal -Purvi Mehta

Share this article Share this article
published Published on Oct 20, 2018   modified Modified on Oct 20, 2018
-The Hindu Business Line

They account for a third of the agricultural workforce, but don’t get the benefits and opportunities the menfolk enjoy

India celebrated its first Women Farmer’s Day on October 15, but the word farmer or kisan is still seen as being synonymous with a male farm worker. This perception is built on two assumptions — first, farming is a masculine profession; and, second, when women are involved in farm activities, they largely play supporting roles.

But anecdotal evidence, data, and research have consistently broken this myth. Women’s presence on farms can be seen by anyone travelling across India. The numbers further confirm it — 80 per cent of financially independent women are engaged in farm-related activities in India. Of them, 33 per cent are working as agricultural labourers and 48 per cent are self-employed farmers.

The second myth, around the nature of the women’s work in agriculture, is also broken. Research studies have consistently shown that women are, in fact, involved in the entire value chain of food production as well as in allied income-generating activities like cattle and livestock management.

Indeed, while there may be considerable variation in the participation and scope of work, based on States, crop patterns, location, and age, the fact remains that women make up one-third of the agricultural workforce — making this sector the largest employer of women in India.

Lesser benefits

Despite their presence and involvement, however, the irony is that compared to men, women often don’t own the title to the land they cultivate. They receive differential prices for the products they sell in markets and in terms of daily wages, they are often paid less than their male counterparts for the same work. By government estimates, this wage gap is nearly as wide as 25 per cent.

Other disadvantages that women face are with regards to access to credit, capacity building opportunities, and technology. The imbalance — between what women do and how they benefit — was well captured by a 2010-11 FAO report which pointed out that if women in rural areas had the same access to land, technology, financial services, education, and markets as men, we could see a 20-30 per cent increase in yields on women’s farms, which could raise agricultural output in developing countries by 2.5-4 per cent.

This paradox — high participation but limited benefits to women farmers — is the challenge that first needs to be acknowledged and then consciously addressed by re-framing policies and developmental interventions in a way that gives women an equal chance within this sector.

Perhaps one of the best examples to illustrate the blind spot has been historical, predominantly male composition, and lack of gender-orientation of the agricultural extension workers. While studies have consistently shown that extension services are not offered in a vacuum — where either socio-economic or gender considerations can be ignored — the extension workers are predominantly male.

Given that these workers are any farmer’s first point of contact and work as a conduit to access knowledge on credit, inputs, and other skills necessary for successful production and marketing, it becomes necessary that this key facilitative network is gender-neutral.

Please click here to read more.

The Hindu Business Line, 19 October, 2018, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/time-women-farmers-got-a-better-deal/article25264431.ece?homepage=true


Related Articles

 

Write Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Video Archives

Archives

share on Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Feedback
Read Later

Contact Form

Please enter security code
      Close