SEARCH RESULT

Total Matching Records found : 2557

Gulberg Society massacre: court reserves order

-The Hindu The Ahmedabad Metropolitan Court on Tuesday reserved its order till April 10 on a plea for making public the report of the Supreme Court–appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) on the 2002 Gulberg Society carnage. The SIT submitted the report in a sealed cover last month and all the documents and evidences of over 20,000 pages earlier this month in five locked trunks for the court's perusal. ...

More »

Schools in limbo over RTE clause-Yogita Rao

With the decision on 25% reservation for underprivileged students in all schools, including private and unaided ones, pending in the Supreme Court, city schools are finding it difficult to keep seats vacant.  Most schools have completed the admission process. Some have managed to keep 10% seats vacant, in case the order comes out before the session begins. This would be the third consecutive year, when this clause under theRight to Free...

More »

Judicial Control of Policymaking and Implementation: Interlinking Rivers by Videh Upadhyay

The Supreme Court has handed down an extraordinary decision with some extraordinary arguments directing the central government to execute the “river interlinking project”. How could the Court which says “it can hardly take unto itself tasks of making of a policy decision or planning for the country on the need for acquisition and construction of river linking channels” then go on to actually take the very same policy decision and...

More »

SC cites overreach on quiz-Modi plea-Samanwaya Rautray

The Supreme Court today refused to direct the Nanavati Commission to summon and question Narendra Modi about his alleged role in the 2002 riots, saying that doing so would amount to “judicial overreach”. The court’s decision followed an embarrassing gaffe it had made in the case a week ago, and would come as a relief to the Gujarat chief minister. Ironically enough, the two-judge bench had sought to issue notices on the...

More »

Govt bats for forces act

-The Telegraph The Centre today told the Supreme Court that no prosecution could be launched against armed forces fighting “counter-insurgency” and sought four months to decide whether to grant sanction to prosecute officers over a 12-year-old alleged fake encounter in Kashmir. The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, invoked in “disturbed areas”, specifically mandates prior sanction before any prosecution can begin, the government told the court while replying to a notice on the...

More »

Video Archives

Archives

share on Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Feedback
Read Later

Contact Form

Please enter security code
      Close