-The Economic Times The government's sanction to prosecute some social networking sites, including Facebook and Google, in response to a Delhi court's hearing of a complaint against these sites for allegedly carrying objectionable content, will reignite the debate on censorship, freedom of expression and what constitutes profanity or offence. At first glance, the government's reaction would seem to be missing the wood for the trees. Most such sites or internet companies aver...
More »SEARCH RESULT
Government has no plans to hike urea prices-sources
-Reuters Ministry for Chemicals and Fertilisers has no plans to raise prices of urea, the most widely used soil nutrient in the country, two ministry sources said. Two Newspapers reported on Monday that the government planned to increase prices of urea by 40 per cent to reduce a mounting subsidy burden. "There is no proposal to raise prices of urea," a ministry source told reporters. Another ministry source said: "The urea prices were revised...
More »India isn’t China
-The Indian Express After a Delhi trial court summoned the executives of 21 companies, including Google and Facebook, the Delhi high court responded to their petitions by warning them to take down “objectionable” material, or risk being “blocked” altogether. In Justice Suresh Kait’s words: “You must have a stringent check. Otherwise, like China, we may pass orders banning all such websites.” The government, which was asked to indicate if it agreed...
More »Why are India's media under fire? by Soutik Biswas
Has the explosion of media in India been a mixed blessing? With more than 70,000 Newspapers and over 500 satellite channels in several languages, Indians are seemingly spoilt for choice and diversity. India is already the biggest newspaper market in the world - over 100 million copies sold each day. Advertising revenues have soared. In the past two decades, the number of channels has grown from one - the dowdy state-owned broadcaster...
More »Adivasi Predicament in Chhattisgarh by Supriya Sharma
Not only are the Forest Rights Act and the Panchayats Extension to Scheduled Areas Act routinely violated in Chhattisgarh, the adivasis are also short-changed on legislative representation and reservations in government jobs. As the state cedes land to capital while reducing the adivasis to an ornamental presence, there is increasing assertion of adivasi identity, born out of class predicaments and experiences of displacement as much as notions of indigeneity. Supriya Sharma...
More »